A couple of years ago I was talking to a diplomat at the United Nations in New York. His country was one of the leads on the UN’s major conference on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and my goal was to persuade him to include a reference to Neglected Tropical Diseases in the Political Declaration that came out of the conference.
I spoke to him briefly in a busy corridor after a side event as he was rushing to his next engagement. He was dismissive at first. The SDGs are massive in scope and there were dozens of special interest groups vying for a reference in the Political Declaration. In fact, persons with disability were one of the groups that had not received a reference in the first draft, despite having a UN Convention affirming their rights. When he heard me asking for a reference to Neglected Tropical Diseases, what he heard was a niche group asking for a reference in a document that affected the whole planet.
He said to me: “I’m sorry, but the declaration is already too full and I don’t think we’re going to find room for a small issue like this.”
My response was: “Really? Neglected Tropical Diseases aren’t a small issue. They affect 1.7bn people across the world.”
That was when he changed his tune. I walked away with his business card and a promise to look at the language I sent over to him. In the end, it was the number that made the difference.
I could have told him about how dreadful some NTDs are. I could have told him stories of people who had lived with the effects of NTDs. I could have focused only on leprosy, as I was representing The Leprosy Mission. All of these things might have made a difference and if I had more time, I might have tried them. But my time was short and he works at the UN, where ‘big picture’ is the raison d'être, so I went for the biggest picture I had: 1.7bn people, or, put differently, 1 in 5 people.